JIRA does not support an easy way of handling multiple levels of hierarchy in a natural way and the available workarounds require additional steps which render the solution suboptimal. And then each of the sub-tasks may be consequently broken into a set of even more granular entities. During the process of analysis a simple story can be broken into a number of sub-tasks. But in reality the process of resolving issues can be much more complicated. As of today JIRA offers only a two-level hierarchy (if installed without plugins): stories and subtasks. Resource Inspector: Choose a resource and see general information on resources including contact information, type of resource, cost and. Style Inspector: Set basic style attribute. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.Īs a JIRA user I need more hierarchical organisation of tasks. Omniplan depency type trial The trial I downloaded only said it would last 24 hours but it did state that if you needed more time you could send for another code. I understand that our decision may be disappointing, but we also hope that you will appreciate our candid and transparent approach. Since investing in more extensive issue hierarchies in the Jira platform is not aligned with our strategy and roadmap, we will be closing this issue. Advanced Roadmaps extends Jira hierarchy with the concept of initiative and helps organise and prioritise your team's work to build a realistic roadmap that spans multiple teams and Jira projects.Īlso there is a commercial third party plugin available, Structure that provides the ability to create a hierarchy of issues for Jira Server customers. This is why we are investing in Advanced Roadmaps for Jira (formerly known as Portfolio for Jira). Welcome to the tutorial Starting with a blank slate, we’ll build a project from the ground up to show all of the core features of OmniPlan in practical use. Meanwhile, as Atlassian, we understand that growing teams may require more flexibility. We strongly believe that current hierarchy of epic, task (story) and subtask supports this approach. Jira as a tool promotes agile approach to project management, where simplicity is key and teams work iteravely to deliver small sections of a project at a time. While we absolutely understand the logic behind this request, we strongly believe that we should focus on making Jira simpler and easier to use rather then introduce additional complexity on both conceptual and technical level. Therefore we decided to close this issue. We (the Jira Server team) have recently reviewed this suggestion and how it would fit alongside our strategy and other customer priorities. I am afraid we are not planning to invest in more extensive issue hierarchies in Jira. I know it's been a while since we last commented on this suggestion and we are sorry to have kept you so long without a clear answer. Thanks for providing your thoughts and votes on this suggestion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |